On 2/11/07, Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> wrote:
This would be problematic for our own uses unless the
CC-BY-SA / GFDL
compatibility issues are resolved. The wording of the cc-by-sa requires
any derivative works to be distributed "only under a license identical
to this one"
The license could make a distinction between works which are direct
derivatives, and separate works which are used in a way where one
semantically depends on the other. In the second case, it could allow
them to be under separate licenses, as long as all component licenses
are free content licenses.
--
Peace & Love,
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.