2009/3/23 Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>om>:
There are many situations in which it could be
useful to have a way to
quantify the quality, rather than just number of articles, of a
Wikipedia edition. If the whole formula is flawed, we should find a
better one.
Step one: Define "quality".
If you give me an unambiguous, uncontroversial definition of quality,
I'll find you a formula for it.
It doesn't have to be unambiguous or uncontroversial, it only has to be
useful.