The only issue is that most of all of the projects /lack/ an arbcom or oversight body, sans administrators. Saying "ArbCom will serve as the body" is basically saying "let the main projects lead." Not the best idea, IMHO. Two two positions should be mutually exclusive. Although one might serve in both capacities, they do so as two different things, not as "ArbCom on MetaCom."
Just my 0.02USD.
Chad
On Jan 4, 2008 6:21 PM, FloNight sydney.poore@gmail.com wrote:
I was thinking of a combination of stewards and members from elected ArbComs.
Having a blend might work best. Keep some connection to the local community as well as meta.
Maybe the steward members would be permanent and the ArbCom members would serve as a pool that could be called to work on a particular case.
I think we can think creatively to come up with a formula that best serves the needs of the Foundation and the Community.
Sydney
On Jan 4, 2008 6:08 PM, daniwo59@aol.com wrote:
Why couldnt the stewards serve as the basis of this meta-arbcom. They were elected, and they represent diverse projects.
Danny
**************Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape. http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l