How is it that you can be so certain that out of 690,000 articles, that none of them have been bot-generated? Are you positive? Have you seen all 690,000?
The declaration that de.wikipedia has absolutely 0 bot-generated articles, or 0 articles that were originally bot-generated and have since been human-edited seems overly pretentious to me. A better display of good faith would be for you to assume that possibility that at some point a bot has created an article on de.wp. It's certainly not an unreasonable assumption by any stretch.
--Andrew Whitworth
On Jan 1, 2008 11:54 AM, Daniel Arnold arnomane@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2007 22:25:26 schrieb iloveplankton:
Wow, you've sure got a lot of bent up angry going on, don't you? I'm sure it was simple mistake, there is no need to call somebody a liar.
I wouldn't have been so angry if this were the first time. Actually several people pointed out this fact on this very list even in this thread.
So if someone still just says that de.wikipedia has bot generated articles cause he can't imagine that nearly 690'000 articles can be created otherwise he acted in bad faith or at least should read first and then write but not the other way round.
Arnomane
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l