On Sep 1, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Todd Allen
<toddmallen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's contradicted by, among other things, ACTRIAL as mentioned above. The
en.wp community came to a clear consensus for a major change, and the WMF
shrugged and said "Nah, rather not."
That's... Not exactly what I remember happening there. What I remember was that a
pretty good number (~500) of enwiki community members came together and agreed on a
problem, and one plan for how to fix it and asked the WMF to implement it. The WMF
evaluated it, and saw a threat to a basic project value. WMF then asked "what's
the problem you're actually trying to solve?", and proposed and built a set of
tools to directly address that problem without compromising the core value of openness.
And it seems to have worked out pretty well because I haven't heard a ton of
complaints about that problem since.
______________________
Philippe Beaudette
Director, Community Advocacy