On 21/11/2007, Robert Rohde <rarohde(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The GFDL also promises that any "new versions [of
the GFDL] will be similar
in spirit to the present version". If the future versions change in any
major way, that's a substantial clause by which to litigate under. For
example, if the future GFDL changes when and how authors are acknowledged,
one could argue that such changes are not similar in spirit to the present
version.
One could argue this where precisely? In which court against who?
Most of these hypotheticals are vacuous and self-FUDding. The law is
not deterministic computer code.
- d.