On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Samuel Klein <sjklein(a)hcs.harvard.edu> wrote:
Andre, this is a great summary -- I've linked to
it from the english
ws Scriptorium.
Do you see opportunities for the two projects to coordinate their
wofklows better?
^^^^^^^
Clearly this email needed 1 more round of human checking.
SJ
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Typical about the PGDP workflow are an emphasis on quality above
> quantity (exemplified in running not 1 or 2 but 3 rounds of human
> checking of the OCR result - correctness in copying is well above
> 99.99% for most books) and work being done in page-size chunks rather