Milos Rancic wrote:
So, let's try analyze a couple of random pages
from Volapuk Wikipedia
and its interwikis:
2) Rossana, municipality in Piedmnot, Italy [3]
- German - bot generated article.
wrong. This article is written (and started) by humans, we don't have
bot generated content on de-WP.
4) Bayeux, a town in France [5]. It seems that this
article should be
fixed on Volapuk.
- Czech - bot generated article with some extra informations.
- Danish - possibly bot generated article with a link to Commons.
- German - possibly bot generated article with a lot of extra
informations; also very important to me because I saw that it has IPA
transcription of French (which is necessary for adding articles about
French places on Serbian Wikipedia).
written by many humans over the time, no bot here.
So, conclusions are:
- German Wikipedia also uses bots. Some of those articles on German
Wikipedia are at the same level of quality. Which implies that
contributors to German Wikipedia should think firstly about their
project.
flat wrong. No bots on de-WP.
- Some of the articles from German Wikipedia were bot
generated
articles which evolved into much better articles. This implies that
contributors from Greman Wikipedia which denies the same right (of
evolving articles) to the contributors of other projects are doing
that only because of their extremely high vanity: it seems that they
don't want that other projects become at the same level of quality
like German Wikipedia is.
flat wrong - no bot-generated articles on de-WP. All started by human
authors, and expanded from there.
Ciao Henning