> I would also find that helpful (if this isn't a policy that's been completely rewritten). The legal text isn't especially easy to read and understand either, so my only question would be if this new policy would prevent past events that happened because this kind of policy did not exist back then.
I think the biggest specific change is that the Board can no longer authorise appointments for people who have been on the Board in the last 6 months. Which is sensible, and addresses the main concern that prompted the review.
C