Hi Robert,
Simply highlighting the ~1 page of arguably controversial stuff in a 67
page document is also unlikely to be optimal, because it creates a biased
and misleading impression of the whole document, and gives the impression
(accurately or not) that one's main interest is stirring up controversy.
That's very dismissive of legitimate concerns. If something is of genuine
worry, how many pages should it take up before we are allowed to raise our
concerns about it?
Where there's a genuine worry, I think it's much more likely to get a
constructive response if the worry is expressed with understanding of the
context.
"Here are my five concerns about this document" is quite a different thing
to read from "Most of this document seems pretty sensible. However, are
five concerns I have about it, though I think I have only spotted one of
them actually happening at all"
Regards,
Chris