On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
What you hear is "Wikidata is unreliable"
(compared to the respective
Wikipedia; proof, anyone? Please, show me proof; silence or anecdotes don't
count)
Any non-trivial content you want to add to Wikipedia today has to fulfil
one basic criterion: that the content be traceable to a professionally
published source.
Most Wikidata content fails that criterion.[1] It's blooming obvious that
Wikidata is "unreliable" according to Wikipedia's definition of a
"reliable
source", isn't it?[2]
[1]
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/stats.php
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SPS