On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
When the use case of the Simple Wikipedia is better understood, it may even
make room for more simple projects as in simple projects in the biggest
languages.
Thanks.,
GerardM
If anyone is interested, I believe the other language most suited to
such a project would be French, because of its lingua franca status in
large parts of the developing world.
Thanks,
Pharos
2009/2/25 Cary Bass <cary(a)wikimedia.org>
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
However my central point that a discussion of
something as important as
closing one of our most important projects in a way that few know about
it remains. The !vote is 42:102. We get more at en:WP on a RFA.
A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is
that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills
to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of
language.
Ec
In light of that, I understand that there is some kind of simple
wikipedia usage among the OLPC (One Laptop per Child) distribution.
Perhaps someone could clarify, but if this is the case, then that would
make the likelihood that this already failing proposal would pass even
more remote.
Cary Bass
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l