2009/1/22 Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.comwrote:
It all boils down to how you define "reasonable", and that's usually left to laymen, not lawyers.
Which is why I for one say shame on CC for using such crappy phrasing. Essentially they're saying "require attribution, but what form that attribution comes in is what author(s) deem to be reasonable."
It's what a jury deems reasonable, rather than the author(s), isn't it?