Such as an editor who believes he knows
better than others on copyright issues and implies he
has the approval of the Jimbo and the ability to see
that the foundation shuts down a project if the
contributors do not submit to his opinion. This is an
extreme case where action is needed.
We need a new rule: "Thou shalt not take Jimbo's name in vain."
If Jimbo has an opinion on an issue, he can speak for himself, I'm sure.