-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19/06/2010 19:53, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
My jaw just dropped. While I know these are ideas
intended to help increase
the socialization, this is turning Wikipedia into youtube. The day that
happens I'm resigning all my permissions and packing my bags. Softening
notability? Fantasy articles? Games? Live comments? No thanks.
I don't think the idea of encouraging women to participate needs these
things. I have a fierce dislike for what I consider to be the mind-numbing
distraction that social networking sites provide. I'd rather use Wikimedia
projects to stimulate my mind, not kill time.
Then I made my point. I think futilizing wikipedia is the worst thing we
can do.
On 19/06/2010 07:30, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
???? Saturday 19 June 2010 05:58:31 Milos Rancic
??????:
That means that we need games for women. While I
think that we should
build full social network, just a basic one would help.
Or perhaps we don't even have to build one, but just use the existing
ones.
[People are always against making Wikipedia a social
network.] Have
RSS feeds
of articles you created/pictures you uploaded. These
could then be
connected
to Facebook or wherever for
your friends to see what are you working on.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMHTsdAAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6L+0EIAID3Mr9YKjNNt8WoheHalzw+
n48XQ46nUBbYtb2m38a/IE6TgP1V+rVLb7jvmNZO7wX2CmuO/sW4SlB0phVxcGea
ohDgjDga1u4tXEVnikape4uXCrEyup9EgrTDypb/altrF/dOdzQb9DfoEgqlScL7
v0A/FyD4KHHE0/E1ehI2UdmXyxp4+430T7tdWYM9kqeXUfDHifxjXoATvv1ZK707
jzJr4XiwMfZ2QvCC6M8u+KQIJBU0wSx49iRKZCRtqwPtgp6kzPiyDO5jlzIdleuP
2DOPh7MmQQ2Bed7go90AIrgPQG+DnFGfN+WQqzB7QPis8eFxFe3F1hntU8LhAMQ=
=SSCl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----