Achal, I don't quite understand what is the idea, meaning or whatever you
wrote in your mail.
Can you explain (this time with full and meaningful sentences), please?
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
On 15 November 2011 14:19, Achal Prabhala <aprabhala(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Can we not pick on a person whose "POV" is
that he wishes to participate
in the Wikimedia movement in the fullest way possible?
Pick on me instead. Oh wait...
Best wishes,
Achal
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 07:40 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
OMG Gomà, can´t you leave any thread in peace
without push your POV?
_____
*Béria Lima*
<http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
construir esse sonho.<http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
On 15 November 2011 09:37, Joan Goma<jrgoma(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:12:42 +0000
>> From: B?ria Lima<berialima(a)gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia India Program Trust
>>
>> *The way I see is India is a land of immense potential for the
Wikimedia
>>> Movement. IMHO, There is enough space
of 10 chapters and Wikimedia
>> offices
>>> to co-exist and work together in India.*
>>>
>> Did you ever read the Chapter Agreement you signed with WMF? That
> document
>> states that WMIN is the ONLY chapter of WMF in India, and that any one
>> organization must have their "approval" to work in Indian soil
(I'm
> saying
>> that based in WMPT agreement, WMIN one might be different.)
>>
>>
> I think that the spirit of an agreement is more important than its
wording
> but
> I would like to comment both.
>
> Regarding the wording, in my opinion what the contract says can be
> interpreted exactly the other way around. It says that to create another
> chapter in the same geographical area WMIN will be consulted. [1] It
> doesn’t say that the approval of WMIN is needed. Furthermore to create
an
> organization different than chapters not even
that consultation is
> foreseen.
>
> As for the spirit I feel that the impression that chapters have private
> ownership of land is a big mistake that can leads us to a situation
> contrary to
> our values. This exclusivity is contrary to the spirit of sharing. We
are
> not cultivating potatoes where the owner of
the land keeps the
potatoes. We
> give the potatoes away. The more and better
people working the land more
> potatoes can give away. We don’t need land owners, what we need are
> people working
> the land.
>
> I think these organizations should be happy of having there each other
> andsee
> a chance that what one of them can’t do, perhaps will be done by the
other.
>
>
>
>
>
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Agreement_between_chapters_and_Wikimedi…
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l