Den 8. feb. 2007 kl. 12.17 skrev Andre Engels:
2007/2/8, Gunnar René Øie gunnarre@nvg.ntnu.no:
Because if the fair use claim is valid and strong enough, then commercial re-users can use those fair-use images. Non-commercial and "Wikipedia only"? Not so.
Can they? The en-wp fair use rationale states that it is valid fair use "On the English-language Wikipedia hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation."
And when you hack that part away, and deprecate those templates and rationales that only apply to Wikipedia and non-commercial enteties, you're left with those that would apply to all re-users in countries with a similar fair use doctrine as the US.
And what about ND images? If there is an image that is fair use on a page, and the rationale is strong enough to allow me to use it, then surely I would be allowed to use an ND image at the same place.
I assume you mean non-comm.
Yes, that is true, but then you're tagging it as fair use, not as non- comm.