I'm pleased to accept the epithet. Pro-freedom dogmatist describes me
nicely with respect to many areas of life, including both sexuality
and access to information. I think it comes close to describing most
of the people at Wikipedia in matters of personal life and of
Those who support censorship are obviously not going to be our sources
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:20 PM, stevertigo<stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Matthew
As opposed to you, who'd just love to destroy
that content to get money?
Destroy what content? Recall I used the terms "fetish" and other
destructive-sexuality / pro-depravity articles and images" and
referred to people who support their ubiquitous access as "pro-freedom
dogmatists." Granted there are light, grey, and also black areas
within the overall realm of what might loosely be called "sexuality,"
and we need to deal with most of them, but thats not to say we need to
deal with every destroyed se
x attached concept as if it were a ubiquitous part of any loving
relationship. Wikipedia is censored after all. The question then is
about scale and degree.