Re: [Foundation-l] NPG still violating copyright

Scott, the director of rights and reproductions a the NPG kindly wrote directly back to me very quickly and said (quoting with permission): "We did, indeed, investigate immediately. I am expecting changes to be made, shortly." So, I assume that not only will changes be made to their website soon but we'll be informed what as soon as it does. Sincerely, -Liam Sent from my phone. Wittylama.com/blog On 13/06/2011, at 15:19, Liam Wyatt <liamwyatt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Scott, > It was raised with the NPG, as promised, at the time. They assured me they would investigate immediately on the pages indicated as well as make a random sampling of other pages on their site to see if it had happened elsewhere. > > I'll re-raise this with them today and get back to you when I know any news. > Sincerely, > -Liam > > wittylama.com/blog > Peace, love & metadata > > > On 12 June 2011 22:53, Scott MacDonald <doc.wikipedia(a)ntlworld.com> wrote: > Back in March this year, I pointed out in Wikien-1 that the UKs National > Portrait Gallery, was reusing Wikipedia content (and in particular my work) > without any attribution (and indeed was claiming copyright). > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2011-March/108731.html > > This got some attention at the time, and coverage in the en.wp Signpost. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-03-21/News_an > d_notes > > The matter ended when it was indicated that WMF people in the GLAM project > would raise it with the NPG as a matter of urgency. > > > However, I note that the NPG continues to use copyrighted material without > attribution and with a false copyright claim. > http://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person.php?search=sa&LinkID=mp… > > > >