My view is that any restriction of distribution that is not absolutely
and unquestionably legally necessary is a violation of the moral
rights of the contributors. We contributed to a free encyclopedia, in
the sense that the material could be used freely--and widely. We all
explicitly agreed there could be commercial use, and most of us did
not particularly concern ourselves with how other commercial or
noncommercial sites would use or license the material, as long as what
we put on Wikipedia could be used by anyone.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Dalton
2009/1/24 Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>rg>:
My point of view is that the proposed license update is a violation of the
moral rights of the contributors. If Mike is going to deny that moral
rights exist in the first place, then I feel the need to explain that they
foundation-l mailing list
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.