That sounds a bit like a politician not wanting to admit that they've
abandoned a policy or goal! ;)
It does seem to be the case that it has been decided that the earlier
ideals of *full* transparency and no hierarchy were naive and have
been abandoned.
James
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, James Rigg
<jamesrigg1974(a)googlemail.com>wrote;wrote:
Thanks geni.
So, to put it crudely, the talk of full transparency and lack of
hierarchy is now viewed as just naive idealism that existed at the
start of the project, and which has now been abandoned?
Best
James
Not so much that--as a great many things are done openly.
I think it's more a general agreement that some things, by
their very nature, can't be done openly.
-Chad
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l