Define spam.
Best, H.
On 30/12/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/12/2007, Andrew Whitworth wknight8111@gmail.com wrote:
None of this is "cheating" because the method is not what's important. The real important part is the collection and distribution of free information. Stomping around and threatening some kind of fork or whatever because you don't like the methods of another community to achieve our goals is counterproductive.
Indeed. The problem with the Volapuk Wikipedia as it stands is that this was *not* done to achieve our goals, but as a sort of spam. What was the reason for tolerating this again?
- d.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l