Well, we can change the way refs are done, sure, but I think we want to
watch how we downplay them. We don't want to make them less present, we
want to make them more comprehensible to the layman. Refs are an intrinsic
part of an article, and it doesn't necessarily help an article to make them
easier for contributors to ignore.
--Ford MF
On 9/25/08, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In any case, if anyone wants to (can?) make the
change, here is what I
wanted to change:
Done. So I guess you could edit it, but indirectly!
You're right, the way we currently do references results in a complete
mess. It requires some development work to make any progress, I think
- I'll take a look at the relevant code and see if it can be done
easily.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l