Hoi,
Recently research showed that the majority of our editors is multi
lingual
and edits on multiple projects. This is without considering Commons ...
I
have a user on 491 projects and I am certainly not the only one who has
many
many profiles.
As we did not know the extend to which we generally edit in many
languages,
we have not considered the needs of this majority. Our view has always
been
on single projects. We can do better and we should do better for our
majority.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 28 June 2011 13:27, Peter Coombe <thewub.wiki(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 28 June 2011 08:35, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hoi,
I have read the replies that are against social networking
functionality.
In
my opinion you are all missing the point. Our
projects are crowd
sourced
projects and we do not support collaboration, we
do not support
special
projects. We need to.
Yeah! Special projects with a narrower focus would be great, how about
giving them a catchy name like "WikiProjects". Maybe we could give
every article a "talk page" for users to collaborate on. Heck, let's
go mad and give users their own talk pages too! Now if only there was
some protocol for real time chats we could use...
Social networking in our context will not be a
Facebook, a Twitter
or an
IRC. It will have the parts that we need and it
will support our
activities.
Thanks,
I'm all for improving the interface around these things, but exactly
what functionality are you asking for that we don't already have?
Pete / the wub
On 27 June 2011 18:24, Nathan
<nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> <gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi.
> > Wikipedia should be more like a social network. It provides us
with
the
> > opportunity to reach out to people when
we want to crowd source
some
> > activity. We have a problem in retaining
people particular
newbies.
When
> we
> > show a social side to our work on open content (not only
encyclopaedic
>> > content) we stand a better chance we are likely to do better.
>>
Thanks,
>> >
GerardM
>>
>> That's an interesting theory. Wikipedia is sort of the epitome of a
>> social enterprise, and all of the good and the bad in the project
can
> be traced to its social nature. Trying to
make it more like a
"social
> network" can only be interpreted as
making it more like some other
> social network, perhaps by integrating purely social mechanisms a
la
> Facebook. Of course, that could either help
or hinder, with no way
to
> know for sure in advance; perhaps encouraging
more social
interaction
> would exacerbate and personalize the disputes
and conflicts that
drive
> people away.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: