-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Delphine Ménard wrote:
[Snip]
You will find below a grid of what we think needs to be included in a five year plan for the Wikimedia Foundation. You may fill all parts, or just some, as suits you. You may also give details on how to get there, or not. You're free to say anything that goes through your head. Your ideas should go on this list.
[Snip]
*Board and management
I imagine that by this time we will probably have a steering committee of some sorts as well as an executive committee, splitting the functions of the Board somewhat - the former is more what normally constitutes a "board", whereas the latter is normally accomplished by the executive officers who we now have begun to (ever-so-slightly) separate from the Board.
The role of President is a semi-steering, semi-executive figure-head one, one which I feel Jimbo would like to fill, and would be involved in both the Board and the Executive Committee (for want of better terms), but would not be the lead in either. The Chair should be a separate, neutral figure (along the lines of European Chairs who are there almost as secretaries, guiding the discussions along and being in charge of their votes). As for membership, as well as the Chair and President (neither of whom would normally 'vote' per se), the Board should have three members directly elected by the general editor population, and a further three appointed there by the chapters collectively. It would have (at least) one paid secretary.
*Staff (the positions, the roles, whether they're paid or not)
The top level of staff would form the Executive Committee - as well as the President, there would be:
* Executive Officer,
The EO would work on general management and co-ordination, as well as major partnerships and co-operation (e.g. with the UN). Under the EO would be a few secretaries to just keep up with all the work they will have.
* Finance Officer,
The FO would be responsible for managing all aspects of the finances, both raising and expending. Under the FO would be the Grants Officer, the Fundraising Officer, and one (or more) professional accountants.
* Internal Communications Officer,
The ICO would be responsible for internal communications, making sure that the top and bottom of organisation all knew what the others were doing, including a massive continuous translation service.
* External Communications Officer,
The ECO would be responsible for external communications - press relations as well as public relations generally.
* Legal Counsel
The LC would deal with legal problems (which we will no doubt have lots of, opportunistic suits, etc. :-(), and would advise the ExCom and the Board. The LC would no doubt have a legal team working under them, possibly an externally contracted-in company like Delphine has suggested.
* Operations Officer,
The OO would be responsible for operations, including development. Under the OO would work the Development Officer and the Hardware Officer.
* Chapter Officer
The CO would co-ordinate with the local chapters. Not sure what this will involve just yet, so I don't know what more to say.
* Research Co-ordination Officer
The RCO would be responsible for helping research, by both internal and external parties, and would work in close partnership with the Operations Officer to effect this (for matters of development research, for example). Possibly would work under the OO instead of along-side, indeed.
* Lobbying Officer
The LO would help the Foundation lobby for freedom of information and press (e.g. against still-further extended copyright laws, or in favour of press freedom, etc.)
*Budget
No idea. Quite possibly vast; a few million Euros a year, certainly.
*Fundraising scheme
Twice-annually there would be a fundraising effort for personal donations, but a large amount of the funding would come from large philanthropic and governmental organisations.
*Philantropic activity and outreach to get our content widely
redistributed
The EO would work with outside agencies (printers, etc.) and distribution organisations to help accomplish our goals with giving the world all the information we can.
*Projects
Hopefully Wikipedia will be recognised as a sub-project of Wikibooks. ;-)
More seriously: maturing of the projects, especially Wikibooks if helped along by environmental improvements, into a much more "natural" project. I don't really see that there would be much scope for further front-end projects.
On the back-end, however, I can foresee a great effort in data-driven projects - a Wikidata-based repository of direct facts that can be then woven into each of the front-end projects in a "live" way - as well as consolidation of our two rather disparate media efforts into one.
*Content objectives
Not sure. We should see where the community takes us, really, and support that, rather than trying to push people towards something specific. Having said that, of course, a Wikipedia 1.0 would be very nice ("sifter"-based, naturally - leverage the power of the community, which is what makes us great, into the venture).
*Software objectives
Broadening of MediaWiki into being not "merely" the best possible article wiki we could have, but also a data- and media- repository and sharing facility.
*Relationship between chapters and parent organisation
The chapters would be involved in purely local matters, of course, but most of their efforts would be devoted to working on international projects organised and led by the Foundation. My view is of quite a centralised system, like the ICRCRC has.
*Relationships with the outside world (PR, partnerships, etc.)
I imagine UNESCO will want to work slowly with us. Certainly, funding would be nice (absolute editorial independence would of course be a cast-iron requirement before any relations were entered into). Others include the EU and the Commonwealth, and I'm sure there are many more international and internationalist pro-education groups out there which would love to give us money, if only we could get to them.
- ----
This is all probably both horribly naïve and unreachable goals, and tremendously unpopular with the rest of you. Ah well. :-)
Yours sincerely, - -- James D. Forrester Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]] E-Mail : james@jdforrester.org IM (MSN) : jamesdforrester@hotmail.com