Wikigadugi is listed here at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GFDL_Compliance
as
" ...Either more research is needed, or it is disputed Fail in a very significant way such as claiming their own copyright without including a GFDL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFDL notice ..."
Pardon me folks, but if someone feels we are not in compliance with the GFDL, can please someone point out where this is the case? All of our content is GFDL compliant and we do not offer any license other than the GFDL and post the GFDL to our site.
I am happy to address and correct any issues with use of the Foundations content if anyone feels it is not adequately spelled out as GFDL.
Jeff