Christiaan Briggs (christiaan@last-straw.net) [050224 23:36]:
I've come back for more advice. Although the outlining of and discussion about the desirability of [[End-user image suppression]] has been moved to [[Desirability of End-user image suppression]], and this is made clear in the opening paragraph of [[End-user image suppression]], User:GerardM is still insisting on posting desirability discussion to [[End-user image suppression]]. What to do?
The desirability discussion presumably needs greater notice in the technical discussion. Many people (myself included) consider separation of technical methods of implementing a highly debatable policy decision from debate of the desirability of that policy decision to be artificial and disingenuous at best. Doing so appears to make the debatable social decision a fait accompli. Trying to send *all* criticism off to a separate article is also a favourite tool of POV warriors on en: and presumably elsewhere; possibly this is seen as reminiscent of that.
- d.