On 29 November 2011 12:03, Tobias Oelgarte
<tobias.oelgarte(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
What i found to be the best solution so far was
the "blurred images
filter". You can 'opt-in' to enable it and all images will be blurred as
the default. Since they are only blurred you will get a rough impression
on what to expect (something the what a hidden image can't do) and an
blurred image can be viewed by just hovering the mouse cursor over it.
While you browse, not a single click is needed. On top of that it is
awfully easy to implement, we already have a running version of it (see
brainstorming page), it doesn't feed any information to actual censors
and it is in no way a violation with NPOV. So far i didn't hear any
constructive critic why this wouldn't be a very good solution.
I gave one before:
From the far side of the office, a blurred penis
on your screen looks
like a blurred penis on your screen.
For this reason, I suggest a blank grey square instead.
- d.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Just use another imageprocessingfilter and it will not look like a
blurred penis, but maybe like a distorted penis or an arm.