Aagain I am posting the link to my blog - it seems as if just some very
few people read it - there is some experience behind all this. I posted
this already on the date it was written here.
Sorry, I am overloaded right now with work and cannot really take part
in this discussion:
http://sabinecretella.blogspot.com/2007/03/language-prevention-committee.ht…
Thanks, Sabine
Mark Williamson schrieb:
That's what all the debate is about. Some people,
such as Jeff and
most of the people on the Langcom, seem to feel this is necessary.
Others, such as myself, Arbeo, David Gerard, yourself (Robert) and
several others seem to be having difficulty understanding why this is
necessary for precisely the reasons you have outlined.
Nobody seems to be making any new arguments.
Suffice to say, from discussions I have had with people who had
_formerly_ *approved* Wikipedias, they cannot understand why they are
required to do this, many of them don't know what exactly it is that
is required of them, and they are confused. It should be the
responsibility of the LAnguage Committee, not of me, to explain to
them what is happening here and give them a tutorial on how to edit
the messages file and give them help dealing with the problems like
the ones Fulup encountered.
We need to be amicable and try to make this process easier for these
people, not make it some sort of obstacle course.
Mark