I think the reasons for less active editors is primarily because a large part of common knowledge is already now created and being held in Wikipedia, unlike at the start and first few years of it's existence.

No, I think the problem is the impenetrable thicket of jargon and bureaucracy and the bias for deletionism.

Can’t it be both?

Because the more general areas of knowledge is covered, we’re less inclined to be understandable towards newer editors and more inclined to delete.

The problem I think we have now is trying to attract subject matter experts, possibly along with their students/proteges, who can contribute reliable sources to Wikipedia.

From,
I dream of horses
She/her





On Oct 4, 2024, at 9:57 AM, The Cunctator <cunctator@gmail.com> wrote:

No, I think the problem is the impenetrable thicket of jargon and bureaucracy and the bias for deletionism.

On Fri, Oct 4, 2024, 10:22 AM Thad Guidry <thadmguidry@outlook.com> wrote:
I think the reasons for less active editors is primarily because a large part of common knowledge is already now created and being held in Wikipedia, unlike at the start and first few years of it's existence.

I think generally that as any knowledge base grows, such as Wikimedia, that edits tend to be fewer as general knowledge articles are set in place, and thus remains creating only articles that cover the long tail of remaining knowledge.  Hence, we are in a position in many of the larger language Wikipedia's having less of a need for general article authorship, and instead a need for creating articles that cover the long tails of knowledge with domain experts.

-Thad
From: Anders Wennersten <mail@anderswennersten.se>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 8:52 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Trend of number of active editor
 
We have often discussed the trend of fewer active editors, and some of
us have just  discussed this at nowp and swwp and one of my fellow
wikiedian has made a very interesting comparison graph where the numbers
are normalized according to number of speakers, https://puu.sh/Kg6xQ.png

As can be seen av very positive trend on frwp and plwp and reassuring
one on enwp. Do we others have important lessons to be learnt from pl
and frwp?

Anders


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/Y6WFUJNFNN63QGUDXVJKDK4EMU2GFUDQ/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/MTN6RCBQKX2QF5MMSCSTTECE4BG4MSVB/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/2FISWVQY326DTAO45RCZV5C6BCA5Z7PD/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org