On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:32 PM, James Salsman jsalsman@gmail.com wrote:
George William Herbert wrote:
... It would also not be much more effort or customer impact to pad to the next larger 1k size for a random large fraction of transmissions.
Padding each transmission with a random number of bytes, up to say 50 or 100, might provide a greater defense against fingerprinting while saving massive amounts of bandwidth.
Or it might provide virtually no defense and not save any bandwidth.