Hoi,
When Gothic was never written in the Latin script, the line is crossed when
it is written in the Latin script. When a encyclopaedia cannot be written in
a language because there is not enough vocabulary and consequently
neologisms have to be created to write the text or when words are given a
meaning that they did not originally have the line is crossed.
Certainly Gothic and probably Anglo-Saxon language have crossed the line
already.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is essentially my position.
However, there is a line to be crossed - when we are writing a
language based on existing materials, and when we are writing in a
language that we have made up. A Gothic or Anglo-Saxon Wikipedia could
possibly stay on the proper side of this line, but a Sumerian
Wikipedia probably could not and a Carian Wikipedia definitely could
not.
Mark
On 02/04/2008, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Jesse Martin
(Pathoschild) <
pathoschild(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The language subcommittee only allows languages that have a living
> native community (except Wikisource, due to its archivist nature).
> This is based on an interpretation of the Wikimedia Foundation
mission
> to "provide the sum of human knowledge
to every human being". Thus,
> the overriding purpose of allowing a wiki in a new language is to
make
> it accessible to more human beings. If a
language has no native
users,
> allowing a wiki in that language does not
fit our mission because it
> does not make that project accessible to more human beings. Instead,
a
wiki in
their native languages should be requested if it doesn't
already exist.
Typically, the users requesting a wiki in an extinct language don't
want to provide educational material to more people at all, but only
want to promote or revive the language. While these are noble goals,
they are not those of the Wikimedia Foundation, so that a wiki should
not be created simply to fulfill them.
But that is my opinion. What do you think; should wikis be allowed in
every extinct language?
--
Yours cordially,
Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
If there are people willing to develop and administer the language
edition
of the encyclopedia, sure. At worst it is their
time to waste. Such
users
should be willing to operate the wiki as in take
care of vandalism and
etc.
If the wiki somehow successfully resurrects a dead language, no harm
done.
It would be great publicity too. I see this as a
no risk endeavored we
should take.
The role of the language subcommittee in my view should be to determine
weather or not there is enough of a community to launch a new language
edition of a project.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l