--- Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think to a great degree this is a modern shift;
it's becoming less
and less vital for an organisation to have to be in a major city in
order to function, especially an organisation which is simply a
central point for a wide virtual network.
IIRC, something like 70% of communication is non-verbal. Being in close proximity to many
like-minded organizations and representatives from other nations, would therefore be
advantageous
to our goal. You simply are not going to find that in St Pete.
As an organization, we have already found that we can accomplish a great deal more with
face-to-face meetings that by using IRC, phones and email. Proximity will increase
opportunities
for communication and thus relationship building.
The savings in travel expenses combined with increasing the opportunities to establish
strategic
relationships (and funding opportunities) should more than offset the increased cost in
rent and
in cost in living increases for staff. Those costs can and should be mitigated for by
avoiding
actually having the office in a world city, but just outside it.
But that is a longer term strategy. Right now, I think we should try to make best use of
our
current location. Thus the need I expressed to sell St Petes / Tampas good points and
take full
advantage of that. However, I dont think it would be a good idea, in the long term, to
keep the
main office there (an office could continue to be there, just not the main one).
-- mav
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/