Delirium <delirium(a)hackish.org> writes:
Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Could you please keep the amount of crackpotish
kookery at a minimum
at this list
In what respect is it "crackpottish" or "kookery"
to suggest that
even appearance of impropriety, even where none exists, is damaging
to nonprofit organizations that depend on public goodwill?
Except for being the umpteent person to continue the line of
aggressive questioning, none. You just happened to be the unlucky roll
of the dice.
I'd like to respectfully ask the participants of this fork of the thread
to immediately cease responding to it. Thanks.