On 2016-03-12 1:35 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
When it is only a nominal consideration but mostly a
chuckle, what does it
say about the validity of those people and their assumptions?
I should say that it says more about the (lack of) validity of the RfC
itself, Gerard. To be fair, while I applauded the *idea* of doing a
consultation about the future of Wikimania in substance and in form,
what actually happened - a very quiet poll involving three preset
options that weren't even satisfactory to the very small number of
participants - cannot possibly be interpreted to reach conclusions to
reshape the biggest community event of the movement.
I'm all for a proper consultation. This wasn't it.
-- Coren / Marc