2007/2/8, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com>om>:
If they are releasing under and ND license, it may
even be because we
already talked to them and failed to help them understand that a basic
strong copyleft licenses will take care of most of the things that
they really care about, such as preventing the fraud of someone making
new versions and blaming them on the original author.. Whenever we see
ND (and NC alike) we are seeing evidence of our own failure to
advocate truly free licenses.
If every ND license is such a failure, we are truly in a horrible state,
because the text of the GFDL itself is under an ND license, and thus we are
not allowed to put it on a Wikipedia page, except for the fact that we
must....
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels