Does anyone have any info on the discussions between jimbo, lessig and rms re: cc-by-sa and gfdl compatibility. If it looks like it is going to happen sometime in the not to distant future, then perhaps some of this discussion won't be as important.
paz y amor, [[User:The bellman]] rjs
On 02 Dec 2004 22:10:00 +0100, Erik Moeller erik_moeller@gmx.de wrote:
During the brainstorming phase of the project, we ran a small straw poll on what the preferred license for Wikinews content would be:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikinews/License_straw_poll
The content that is currently on the Demo wiki is in the public domain in order to facilitate the migration to any other license. In the straw poll, there is currently a small lead in favor of using dual licensing, but the opinions on what licenses to use differ: Some think we should dual-license as copyleft, others believe that we should allow non-copyleft uses for the sake of simplicity. The straw poll as such is not very conclusive.
If there are no objections, I will go ahead and hold a real vote on the issue as soon as demo.wikinews.org is moved to en.wikinews.org. However, please note that this is a rather far-reaching decision, so Board input would be appreciated.
Regards,
Erik _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l