BTW, doesn Lang SubCom has anything to say about this? I saw Gerard's vote, but I would like to see a statement, at least informal, of Lang SubCom members. I didn't see how articles were looking on Lombard Wikipedia, but if they were like articles on Volapuk Wikipedia, I have to say that tendencies in our community are extremely worrying.
Up to those two cases, I was thinking that it would be good to have one community at the global level which would be able to make some decisions. After those two cases, I am really in doubt. It seems that language borders are not giving only nationalisms, but a free space of imposing crazy decisions of wounded vanities, too.
On 12/27/07, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/27/07, Daniel Arnold arnomane@gmx.de wrote:
This is *only* about the way choosen to create the
Volapük Wikipedia.
Besides my comment on Meta: Generated articles are more then valid (please, add sources in all articles!). I may see that one or combination of the next may be the reasons for demanding such nonsense action: (1) someone is afraid with so much articles, (2) someone doesn't like to see that a small community is able to make the same number of articles as big ones, (3) someone is preparing field for removing all bot-generated articles and forbidding such actions. In all cases, please go firstly to the English, French, Italian and Polish Wikipedias.
"(3) someone is preparing field for removing all bot-generated articles and forbidding such actions" appears to be accurate.[1]
Birgitte SB
[1]http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proposals_for_closing_projects/R...
____________________________________________________________________________________Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l