As one has been there, done that, I would like to point out that there is an order of
magnitude difference between Internet Brands and WMF.
Cheers,
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimedia-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Yaroslav M. Blanter
Sent: 12 August 2014 02:00 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Superprotect user right, Comming to a wiki near you
On 12.08.2014 02:26, svetlana wrote:
If we accept the policy in principle, I don't care
who enforces such
policy, that be community or WMF. Such policy does not go against
community entirely, unless WMF shows a will to reject community
patches related to issues which community finds important. Whether or
not this is the case, I don't care; it's a website in their hands and
they're welcome to shut it off without notice, or to experiment at
leisure.
svetlana
Whoever believes that an administration of a crowdsourcing website can do whatever they
want just because they are running the website should recollect what recently happened to
Internet Brands and Wikitravel.
Cheers
Yaroslav
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4744 / Virus Database: 4007/8020 - Release Date: 08/11/14