On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org>wrote;wrote:
(not responding to anyone in particular) I'm one
of the people who tried to
participate in the discussion without taking a strong standpoint
(intentionally - because I'm quite nuanced on the issue, and open for good
arguments of either side) and I have to fully agree with Ryan. I have yet
been unable to participate in this discussion without either being ignored
fully (nothing new to that, I agree) or being put in "the opposite camp". I
basically gave up.
Yeah, tell me about it. I've commented a couple times in public and in
private to no avail, since I don't want to talk about what they want to
focus on. Post a link to a blog, and the thread has 95 replies. Go
So I do have to say that I agree with the sentiment that the discussion is
not very inviting, and is actually discouraging people who want to find a
solution in the middle to participate...
...Hoping for a constructive discussion and more data on what our 'readers'
actually want and/or need...
No dia 30 de Setembro de 2011 11:40, Béria Lima <berialima(a)gmail.com
> *Now, it's completely fair to say that the filter issue remains the
> > in the room until it's resolved what will actually be implemented and
> > *
> You forgot the "*IF*": IF the elephant will be or not implemented.
Wrong thread, but there is no if.