The "minutes" released to the public are ridiculously scant. I tried to find out
more last year about the board's removing the identification requirement from those
the WMF grants access to the non-public information of contributors, but ran into
dead-ends. The only thing I could decipher really is that boardmember Samuel Klein raised
the motion to remove the requirement.
Trillium Corsage
03.03.2016, 16:22, "Brion Vibber" <email clipped>:
On Mar 3, 2016 8:19 AM, "Pete Forsyth"
<peteforsyth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Enjoying this discussion, glad to see it
happening. One question I haven't
seen addressed:
Are there notes kept during executive sessions?
Per the minutes policy listed on wiki yes they are kept; they are kept
separate by the secretary and not published.
-- Brion
From what I've seen, it seems that the
answer might be no -- and that
doesn't seem good. Having minutes is not the same thing as publishing
minutes; but keeping notes on private meetings, if only for the
participants to return to when there is a need to refresh their memories
or
resolve disputes, seems important.
For similar reasons, I like the idea of video- or audio-recording
meetings,
> *independent* of the question of whether such recordings should be more
> widely distributed.
>
> -Pete
> [[User:Peteforsyth]]