I'm only going to comment on 1 aspect here, as others are handling other
aspects already.
I have to object to the idea that all candidates must be able to
communicate in good English.
As an international movement that values Knowledge Equity, it feels bizarre
that we would exclude what I presume is the majority of the movement who
might lack the confidence to contribute in high-detail conversations and
understand high-detail documents in English.
Given the size of the Movement, I find it mildly offensive that we would
privilege English so highly, merely to avoid the expense of translation and
interpretation of Board documents and at Board meetings.
I would urge the Board to reconsider on this specific point, as well as on
the points that have been raised by other wikimedians.
Thank you.
--
Owen Blacker, Cardiff GB
@owen.blacker.me.uk
https://bsky.app/profile/owen.blacker.me.uk, he/him
@owenblacker@dataare.cool
https://dataare.cool/@owenblacker
User:OwenBlacker (meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User%3AOwenBlacker
, enwiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OwenBlacker, frwiki
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:OwenBlacker)
Chair, Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group (meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_LGBT%2B/Portal
)
Recognised on the Pinc List 2026
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/gallery/pinc-list-2026-wales-most-33907108
On Sun, 19 Jul 2026 at 22:09, Victoria Doronina via Wikimedia-l <
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> You say bureaucracy, I say governance. Please forgive me for stating the
> obvious, but WMF is a very large international organisation. It's much
> easier to scale up the experience from a smaller Wikimedia organisation
> than to start from scratch.
>
> And people who have Wikimedia governance experience usually have
> experience with outreach campaigns and education in some form.
>
> I also agree that knowing several languages is valuable, but I don't think
> we should discriminate against "English as a native and only language"
> speakers - it's our working language.
>
> Lastly, while I don't have time to gather the statistics about the current
> and past candidates, I know that I would've qualified when I first ran - as
> a former member of the Russian Wikipedia ArbCom and a former member of the
> Funds Dissemination Committee - note that I've never been on a board of an
> affiliate.
>
> And lastly, I hope that the current criteria will encourage people to
> serve on the global committees such as AffCom, U4C etc, and people who
> serve on them to participate in the Board elections as candidates - we need
> all the talent we can get.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 1:06 PM Samuel Klein via Wikimedia-l <
> wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks so much Margo. The base requirements seem good.
>>
>> The Categories of Governance or Community Experience seem to trend mostly
>> towards bureacratic experience, not related to experience with knowledge
>> work (like education or contribution), or outreach (like partnerships or
>> campaigns), or multilingualism (including translation and multinational
>> initiatives). It also singles out incorporated affiliates with paid staff
>> over all other forms of community organizing and project work, as
>> demonstration of community experience; can you say more about that?
>>
>> Have you analyzed which current and past trustees / candidates would have
>> fit these proposed criteria? That might be a useful appendix for the
>> discussion.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:40 PM Margo Lee via Wikimedia-l <
>> wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Following the 2025 elections, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
>>> committed
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/October_2025_update#c-LLosa_(WMF)-20251015213400-Additional_perspectives_on_current_and_future_board_selection_processes
>>> to reviewing the selection process of new Trustees, soliciting and
>>> receiving feedback and suggestions and proposing changes. The Board
>>> received extensive comments posted on Meta
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2025/Debrief,
>>> which helped inform this approach.
>>>
>>> The Board has discussed the following goals for reforms:
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Clarity and consistency of the electoral process
>>> -
>>>
>>> Clarity of roles and responsibilities
>>> -
>>>
>>> Transparent communications and timeline
>>> -
>>>
>>> A slate of candidates who strengthen the board through the
>>> experience they bring
>>> -
>>>
>>> Reduced need for shortlisting
>>> -
>>>
>>> Strong voter participation
>>>
>>>
>>> The Board is now ready to publish its draft eligibility requirements for
>>> feedback from the community. The requirements are more specific and
>>> detailed than in years past, to both inform the community of what the Board
>>> needs and to create multiple pathways to the Board for Wikimedians. They
>>> are also presented as requirements for candidates, not desirable qualities.
>>>
>>> The Board is also emphasising the need for previous governance
>>> experience, including these key elements of experience:
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Understanding the role of oversight vs. governance vs. management
>>> -
>>>
>>> Understanding Fiduciary Duties
>>>
https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Legal_and_Fiduciary_Duties_for_Wikimedia_Foundation_Trustees_Public_Version.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> Understanding the "Group Dynamics" of a board or committee (and
>>> other collective decision-making bodies): working well with others to ask
>>> probing questions, voice different views and contribute to informed
>>> decisions for the good of the whole, not an individual agenda
>>>
>>>
>>> The Board is now looking for specific feedback on the proposed
>>> eligibility criteria
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2027/Proposed_eligibility_criteria
>>> .
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> The Board Governance Committee
>>>
>>> Margo Lee on behalf of the Governance Committee
>>>
>>> *Margo Lee* (she/her)
>>> Deputy Chief of Staff
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> Public archives at
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/...
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> Public archives at
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/...
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards, Victoria
> Victoria Doronina
>
https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/dr-victoria-doronina/ (she/her),
> UTC
> Wikimedia Foundation Trustee
> Community and Affiliates Liaison
> Human Rights Liaison
>
> Wikimedia Foundation
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>
> "Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
> sum of all knowledge. Please help us make it a reality."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/...
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org