Those who advocate this, though well meaning, go way
beyond our scope.
This is a matter for professional journals, not an unauthoritative
reader-edited encyclopedia
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
It is the intention of some of us to both remain broadly edited by the
general public and to become authoritative, within the bounds of our
general disclaimer, of course. This:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying_reliable_sources_(m…
is our workshop. We do our best, but will do better, with patience and
practice.
Fred