Thank you Garfield for your quick reply - and with welcome news in it. I am
heartened to see your clarification/confirmation that this project is
specifically intending to re-use existing documentation and not to increase
the "red tape" or compliance-requirements of chapters. Also, as mentioned
in my first email, I would like to reiterate my support for the idea that
(especially smaller/newer) chapters have a dedicated contact person. This
will be very helpful for many.
On the other note I raised, could you/anyone also address whether the
chapters had prior-awareness of this new project's existence or planned
creation before this email announcement?
On Friday, 31 October 2014, Garfield Byrd <gbyrd(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Liam:
My apologies for the language you noted, it was not our intent to, even
inadvertently, to degrade anyone. We fully appreciate the abilities of our
community and I know from my meetings with members of our community how
smart and engaged they are in a variety of issues impacting the Wikimedia
movement.
I want to clarify that these Fellows are not auditors. They will be
working from data as presented by the movement entities. The project has
been designed so that the fellows will be using existing data provided by
movement entities and the Fellows will only be reaching out to movement
entities with clarifying questions. So there should be no material
increase in staff/volunteer time to provide information for this project.
If this not the case, please let me know.
Best regards,
Garfield
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Liam Wyatt <liamwyatt(a)gmail.com
<javascript:;>> wrote:
Interesting development. Probably a very good
idea for transparency and
good use of the movement's money, and consistency of reporting to make
things comparable is a great goal. I especially think that for smaller
chapters there is lots of value in having a dedicated contact person!
But I find the self-description of the Fellows as "an elite group of
global
operatives"[1] a bit degrading to the rest
of us...
I presume it's taken a fair while to recruit the team and scope the
project
too (I see one linkedin profile which says
they've been working already
for
two months[3]). So, I wonder - did the Chapters
who have been allocated
to
each of these new auditors[2] have any notice
that this new process was
being created before it was announced today - so they were able to make
any
other time-commitments without being surprised by
a new layer of
paperwork?
Also, I presume that the increased amount of staff/volunteer time needed
to
comply with new paperwork will be offset by
streamlining this with other
WMF-compliance paperwork?
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Oolukoya_(WMF)
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement-wide_Financial_Report#Who_We_Are
[3]
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/seyi-olukoya/59/b09/a7
wittylama.com
Peace, love & metadata
--
wittylama.com
Peace, love & metadata
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Garfield Byrd
Chief of Finance and Administration
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext 6787
415.882.0495 (fax)
www.wikimediafoundation.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
*https://donate.wikimedia.org <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;>
?subject=unsubscribe>