I'm sorry we are putting more energy into what should be banned from commons instead
of searching for mechanisms to protect those readers who would prefer to stay away from
such content.
I mean, I understand the problem with paedophilia, and why it needs to be kept outside
wikimedia projects, but I think it is equally important to provide with the means to
present the content to users in their desired level of exposure; tagging, collapsing and
hiding graphic content would do the trick, and it is technologically straightforward.
Cheers,
MarianoC
--- El lun 6-dic-10, phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki(a)gmail.com> escribió:
De: phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki(a)gmail.com>
Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] 2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content
Para: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Fecha: lunes, 6 de diciembre de 2010, 17:09
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:02 AM,
private musings <thepmaccount(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
I thought I'd note for those interested in the latest
from the
community side of the 'controversial
content'
discussions - the
Commons 'Sexual Content' proposal has
just gone into a
polling stage
thanks for sending this out, and I am glad to see the
discussion/vote
ongoing and hope to see lots of participation in it.
I hope Phoebe doesn't mind me copying her in
on this
email, but I'd
also like to follow up an enquiry about the
working
group she
And thanks for the prod... we've been slow to put together
the working
group that I mentioned in my last message, but it is still
happening.
In the meantime comments on the recommendations are
certainly welcome.
More soon, I hope!
best,
Phoebe
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l