Hoi,
What WMF server allows anonymous uploads of images ? Do you know if this
makes any difference any way ? Who do you think you get an invoice from? Not
the WMF not its chapters. So please THINK
Why bother us with such tripe that is irrelevant to the thread anyway ?
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/1/28 Sam Johnston <samj(a)samj.net>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Gray
<andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
wrote:
2009/1/28 Sam Johnston <samj(a)samj.net>et>:
> Material in the public domain or under a
fully free licence does not
> require any kind of fair use consideration.
I'm not talking about genuinely free material, I'm talking about
protected
> (copyrighted/trademarked) material being uploaded by others - for
example
a
periodic table of elements or medical charts
which would normally be
subject
to deletion (except that they are currently
immediately available for
sale!).
I'm a little confused - surely we would delete this stuff whether or
not there's a "buy a print now" clickthrough button? I can't see
anyone arguing to keep it because they want to run off a poster...
(and to a degree this is rendered moot by that helpful "lowest useful
resolution" requirement of the unfree material rules)
1. Upload high-resolution copyrighted image littered with trademarks as
anonymous user.
2. Immediately order poster of said image.
3. File against WMF, its chapter(s) and the printer for good measure
claiming [RI|MP]AA sized damages for copyright and trademark infringement,
submitting said poster(s) and invoice(s) as evidence.
4. ???
5. Profit!
Note that these steps need not necessarily be completed by the same
parties.
I'm not sure that the courts would have much leeway here (as they might
were
the image not used commercially as was the case before this function was
launched).
Sam
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l