2015-04-01 22:09 GMT+02:00 Marc A. Pelletier <marc(a)uberbox.org>rg>:
On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
This is only the beginning: next step is the
measurement of cute pixels,
encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels.
That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are
equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to
pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels
out of the FOV aren't worth as much!
Also, some historic pixels may be worth several newer ones. Pixel
valuation is an art as much as it is a science.
Thank you for your valuable input, we will think about it for next
Ouais bon, poisson d'avril? :-)
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: