I don't think that was constructive criticism. Personally I think that
Foundation staff should be applauded for trying to be more transparent about
hiring, even if you disagree with what they might be experimenting with.
Steven Walling
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:42 PM, K. Peachey <p858snake(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Daniel Phelps
<dphelps(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Recently we've been having some internal conversations regarding
transparency
for our hiring, recruiting and contracting. In efforts to be
more proactive about sharing this information we're moving to a system of
tweeting short bursts of announcements. This will be done in a "bot" style
voice not unlike the WMF tech feeds. The idea is that we'll get the
information out on new hires and new contractors and consultants working
with us along with new job openings etc. Basically the streams will recap
the comings and goings in a short and sweet format.
I invite you all to see these data streams -
http://identi.ca/wikimediaatwork/all
or
http://twitter.com/wikimediaatwork.
Eventually we also hope to find more ways to use this feed for recruiting
and reaching out to a larger candidate pool and audience. There will also
be times where we link the streams or feeds to longer and more detailed blog
postings.
-Daniel
So you know, all the times people asked to have better systems to
inform of new hirings such as on wiki pages but get told it would take
too long to update them, you decide to implement a even more stupid
and time consuming system in which limited information can be sent
out.
-Peachey
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l