Hardly.
Meta is mostly a work-environment. Transforming it to be a rather public
site would damage its own current role.
WikimediaFoundation wiki would fit that role better. However, there is
much more to the Wikimedia mouvement than just the Foundation.
Currently, we do have a private wiki playing that role. That's
internalwiki. The new site would simply be the public version of internal.
Ant
Casey Brown wrote:
I am supportive of this idea, but can't we just
make better use of
current wikis like Foundationwiki and Meta-Wiki to achieve the same
effect?
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Florence Devouard <Anthere9(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
I posted a proposition regarding the Wikimedia
Mouvement here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Www.wikimedia.org_template
The general idea is to create a website which would report on our global
mouvement. Main benefits would be
* to present ourselves as a loose but nevertheless coordinated body of
some sort (public face)
* share practices and experiences between chapters and wmf
Situation right now is not satisfactory and I believe it likely to
create either more tension or more separation in the future. Generally,
information regarding wikimedia mouvement is hosted on
* internalwiki (private wiki shared between some chapters members and wmf),
* on meta (access to information is very confusing since it is mostly a
work-wiki and a wiki shared by many),
* on Foundationwiki (eg
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_room/Media_Contact_2008)
* on each association website (eg
http://wikimedia.de/)
Can we discuss that ? If you are supportive, please mention it on the
wiki page
Thanks
Ant
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l