2009/1/22 Mike Godwin <mgodwin(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
I'm not the one to decide, nor do I have
particularly strong feelings
about one method of attribution or another. Just thought I'd lay the
blame for this mess where it belongs: a vaguely worded license
with highly debatable terms.
Without defending the particulars of CC's phrasing, which I think has
its problems but which I also think is better than you allow for here,
I'll offer my opinion that a license a license without any vagueness
or debatable terms is such a rarity that I don't think I've ever seen
It it did exist, it would be several volumes long.
Not at all, length just introduces more room for ambiguity.